Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 9:07:34 GMT
Competing in the World Cup. It's a good thing that in football the "rules of origin" are not as strict as in Customs Law, and that players are not "merchandise". Imagine if Neymar and Messi, in their long European season, had undergone a substantial transformation that gave them new individuality! And don’t even mention the added value criterion! [1] According to a survey carried out by Ecuadorian sports journalist Jaime Macías (@jaimefmacias). Morocco, the biggest “importer”, will have 14 players born abroad among its 26 players, and France, the “biggest exporter”, will have 38 players born in its territory playing for other teams. [2] Of the 26 players who will wear the Brazilian shirt, 12 play in the English league, 5 in Spain, 3 in Italy, 2 in France and 1 in Mexico.
Only goalkeeper Weverton (Palmeiras), midfielder Everton Ribeiro (Flamengo) and striker Pedro (Flamengo) play for Brazilian clubs. [3] River Plate goalkeeper Franco Armani. Of the 26 players who will wear the Argentine shirt in Qatar, 9 play in the Spanish league, 6 in Italian, 5 in English, 2 in Portuguese, 2 in French and 1 in German.To the content of the caput must be added that of Chinese Europe Phone Number List its §2 which, in addition to the reference to compensation, states that "the taxpayer is allowed to choose to request a refund". As can be seen, financial compensation for federal tax debts can be achieved via compensation or refund, and the taxpayer has the right to choose to use administrative refunds even in cases where the debts are due to a final and unappealable court ruling, given that the standard does not contain any conditions.
In the same sense is the content of article which also ensures as an alternative the administrative refund of undue tax payments, even if fixed in a final and unappealable judicial decision, providing that the " taxable subject who establishes credit, including judicial ones with final res judicata, relating to a tax or contribution administered by the Federal Revenue Secretariat, subject to refund or reimbursement, may use it to offset its own debts relating to any taxes and contributions administered by it". How to equate the constitutional rule — article 100 with the wording of Constitutional Amendment which establishes that the payment of the undue tax debt recognized in court is consecrated via court order and the provisions of Federal Lawsat authorize administrative restitution of the tax unduly paid without the need to formalize the court order? Despite the scenario of jurisprudential instability on the subject [2] , it seems to us that the text of article 100 itself is the key to the response to this controversy.
Only goalkeeper Weverton (Palmeiras), midfielder Everton Ribeiro (Flamengo) and striker Pedro (Flamengo) play for Brazilian clubs. [3] River Plate goalkeeper Franco Armani. Of the 26 players who will wear the Argentine shirt in Qatar, 9 play in the Spanish league, 6 in Italian, 5 in English, 2 in Portuguese, 2 in French and 1 in German.To the content of the caput must be added that of Chinese Europe Phone Number List its §2 which, in addition to the reference to compensation, states that "the taxpayer is allowed to choose to request a refund". As can be seen, financial compensation for federal tax debts can be achieved via compensation or refund, and the taxpayer has the right to choose to use administrative refunds even in cases where the debts are due to a final and unappealable court ruling, given that the standard does not contain any conditions.
In the same sense is the content of article which also ensures as an alternative the administrative refund of undue tax payments, even if fixed in a final and unappealable judicial decision, providing that the " taxable subject who establishes credit, including judicial ones with final res judicata, relating to a tax or contribution administered by the Federal Revenue Secretariat, subject to refund or reimbursement, may use it to offset its own debts relating to any taxes and contributions administered by it". How to equate the constitutional rule — article 100 with the wording of Constitutional Amendment which establishes that the payment of the undue tax debt recognized in court is consecrated via court order and the provisions of Federal Lawsat authorize administrative restitution of the tax unduly paid without the need to formalize the court order? Despite the scenario of jurisprudential instability on the subject [2] , it seems to us that the text of article 100 itself is the key to the response to this controversy.